Post-Employment Benefits Forum, Wed., 10/21
UC offers employees very competitive pension and retiree health benefits as part of its efforts to attract and retain outstanding faculty and staff, as well as to reward employees for their years of career service. But the cost of those benefits has increased substantially, a trend that is projected to continue.
The President’s Task Force on Post-Employment Benefits is holding forums at UCOP in the Franklin building, room 10325 on Wednesday, October 21, at 1:30 pm to give faculty, staff and retirees the opportunity to ask questions and learn about the immediate and long-term effects of fiscal pressures on the University’s pension and retiree health programs. The forums include a presentation on the issues, followed by time for participants to ask questions.
Please RSVP by Monday, October 19, 2009 to reserve your seat. RSVP by telephone at 510-987-0879 or by email to Rene.Jackson@ucop.edu. You may also participate by telephone. The conference call number is 1-866-740-1260, access code: 9870707#. The link to the online presentation is https://cc.readytalk.com/r/em5yw8b11u6h. Participants will need to give first and last name and e-mail address.
The Task Force has been charged with developing options for balancing the long-term costs of these benefits with the need to provide competitive total compensation to faculty and staff. The Task Force will study the issues, weigh input from the UC community, and then make recommendations to UC President Mark Yudof on ways to change the funding and policies for post-employment benefits.
Executive Director Randy Scott and Director Gary Schlimgen from the Office of the President Human Resources department will make the presentation and be joined by a panel comprised of several representatives from the Task Force who will answer questions and listen to your input.
By the numbers
UC spends roughly $1.5 billion annually in pension benefits, and the retirement plan accrues an additional $1.3 billion in pension liability each year for its current employees. The funded status of the UC Retirement Plan is expected to decline from 95 percent to 61 percent by 2013, even with the restart of contributions in April, 2010.
In 2010, the University will pay approximately $250 million for retiree health benefits. That expense, which is paid for from operating revenue, is projected to increase by about $37 million per year. By 2013, UC will be spending $373 million annually and by 2018, the figure will have climbed to an estimated $610 million.
The University’s long-term liability for retiree health benefits for current and future retirees is also projected to increase, from $13 billion today to nearly $26 billion by 2018. In other words, the liability is increasing at a rate of more than $1.5 billion per year. Governmental accounting regulations now require UC and other employers to include this liability in their financial statements. Such a significant liability could affect UC’s credit rating when borrowing money for campus buildings, hospitals and other projects.
To learn more about the mission and charge of the Task Force, visit the Future of UC Retirement Benefits website.
what time is the 10/22 workshop?
It is starting at 1:30. We should all attend and ask the following questions:
• If UC is concerned about the health of its pension, why didn’t it begin saving toward its own contribution to the pension years ago and and begin paying regardless of whether and how much its employees and the state paid?
• Since workers have been paying 2% into the pension and UC has been paying nothing, isn’t it fair for UC to begin by paying more than 4% to 6% into the pension in 2010?
• Is UC’s proposal that retired UC workers pay more for health care fair to a vulnerable population that depend on affordable health care?
•UC workers should have a voice on our own pension plan. Why won’t UC uphold this basic principle? For example, Why don’t UC workers have elected representatives on their own pension board of trustees like Cal State U, Community Colleges and other state workers do at CalPERS?
• Why isn’t UC’s leadership mounting a public campaign to keep UC public and adequately funded (including the pension) instead of embracing privatization?